PARADOX and the Utility of Semantic Theory as a Theory of Power.

This site is dedicated to revealing the Kleinbottle and Moebius principle as the foundational structure underlying natural systems and hence their applicability to all systems in general. Foundational studies reveal the consistent incommensurability of infinitesimals (zero and infinity; all and nothing) and the constant reformulations of axiomatic theories that attempt to resolve issues of paradox, through complex classifications and hierarchies.

The Kleinbottle and Moebius principle reveals the structural unification of complementary opposites, and hence of surface and boundary conditions, (inside and outside being the same side) through a continuous structural topology. These topologies are hyper-recursive or as Steven Rosen calls them, radically recursive, and hence the moebius strip, classic kleinbottle and moebius-kleinbottle, present more adequate geometric dynamics to describe living and real systems. Therefore, it is these topologies that bridge the chasm between between the real and the artificial, and open a more satisfactory rationalisation of the hard questions of science that remain unanswered. These are questions of consciousness and cosmology.

With extensive investigation of the history of these shapes, the necessity for top down mediation of knowledge, which has been inheritedas the agency of civilisation itself, has been utilised to support defence and national securities, and has directed science toward over-simplifications of theoretical speculation, in support of the mechanistic materialism that has given cultures extraordinary technologies of defence. This is partly due to the understanding that simplified systems of logic and maths will produce more elegant and precise approximations to real systems and entities, and partly because the technologies themselves have been so successful. Hence, certain directives, necessitated by the belief in authoritarian control and covert manipulation of nature and of artificial cultural system, have permitted reformulations of mathematical and scientific languages, that have inadvertently retarded the potential of pure science and epistemologies to reveal the truth of nature and emancipate collective humanity.

It is also revealed that the culture of domination and authority itself is the inherited epistemological flaw, and unless this is realised, global fascism is inevitable.

The inevitability is against life and against nature, and epitomises the current will to progress scientifically and technologically without immediate revisions, and without shifting the global economies toward alternatives sciences that have thrived on the ingenuity of applied knowledge not bound by the conditional constraints of scientific indoctrination and propaganda.

These alternatives exists and are viable, yet are marginalised, and targeted by pathological sceptics who believe they themselves that are engaged in nationalist liberal conservational support for the dominant mindset that they cannot see as constrained by the military organisation and management of knowledge itself.

We are henceforth engaged in one of the precarious epochs in history.

Without clarification of meanings of words, and hence of semantics, and of the power of signs and symbols, and codifications of knowledge, the chaos and confusion that results in an incoherence of thought itself, where individuals are engaged in fighting for either side of a binary condition, that is either side of a surface, that is distinctly separated only from local conditions, which at a higher global level, is unified and complementary.

The inherited necessities of defence, allegiance and opposition, are as old as history itself, and are conditional to a perception of difference rather than of similarity, and its consequent projections and prejudice, conditions the reasoning behind conflict.

It has only been since the relatively recent globalisation of empires, that the flaws in the foundational logic have been exposed. The paradoxes inherent in the seemingly overwhelming and miserable state of the human global condition, and the violence of conflict that underpins the presumption that humans are inherently evil and unreasonable, are therefore dependent on the filters and hence cosmographic structures and geometries inherent in cultural mindsets themselves. The quest for universal human reason, and hence collective human freedom and peace, is reliant on the overarching resolution of foundational epistemological flaws. The postmodern attacks on science as being incapable of resolving these conflicts, have only partially approached the issue of hegemony, and hence have themselves been incapable of resolving the inconsistencies and locating the driving force that has redirected science in favour of its utilitarian function. The great potential of the humanist project apparent in the rise of a new Renaissance potential of the late 18800’s and inherent in higherdimensional topologies and maths, were negated by utilitarian conservative liberals who in defence of their industrialist economy, imposed a radical shift away from the work of German mathematician Felix Klein and Sophus Lie, toward Hilbert’s project in the late 1870’s.

The solution to the fundamental crises that plague industrialists then as it does today, was to find and colonise a world that would provide fossil fuels for this enterprise.

Australia was the solution, as it is today, providing an increase in the mining of coal to support the growing economies that remain dependent on petroleum and coal fuel.

This is THE “SHELL” GAME.

Without epistemological resolution to the fundamental and foundational flaws that have been negated in favour of supporting business at the expense of nature and human freedom, there is the risk that a wholly new and more dangerous authoritarian mechanism for control will impose a global fascism that is the epitome of the greatest threat to humanistic rights and freedoms, and is against the “ideals” of the western mindset itself, that prides itself on providing the very space for truth and freedom to flourish. This threat is located in the cybernetic dream of techno-humanism, and the technological singularity.

As a secular humanist, and one who truly believes in human freedom, and is a firm believer of evolutionary theory as applied both to natural systems and to cultural systems, the issue of religion and of any dogmatic constraint over science and free thought, as a structural device of authoritarian and patriarchal control, must follow through with the revision and resolution of foundational epistemological flaws as well as these revisions being applied to all cultural systems of knowledge, for to negate such things, is a negation of truth, freedom, and life itself. 

Dogmatic intolerance that permits extreme violence and radical degrees of authoritarian fascism, from either Judeo Christian, Aethiest, Moslem, Hindu, or any religious construct, or indeed from a dogmatic dictate of a dominant sciencific authority, which permits unreasonable, irrational and unethical abuse of nature and of all kingdoms, must not be permitted to be the means that negates multicultural unity and the integrity of all beliefs.

Therefore, it is the objective of the material contained in this site, to offer a call to clarification and integration through foundational revisions, as a fundamental step toward clearly negotiating the future.